10/31/2012

Constellation Brands Misses on the Top and Bottom Lines

Constellation Brands (NYSE: STZ  ) reported earnings on Jan. 5. Here are the numbers you need to know.

The 10-second takeaway
For the quarter ended Nov. 30 (Q3), Constellation Brands missed on revenues and missed on earnings per share.

Compared to the prior-year quarter, revenue shrank significantly, and earnings per share dropped significantly.

Margins improved across the board.

Revenue details
Constellation Brands reported revenue of $701 million. The seven analysts polled by S&P Capital IQ expected revenue of $720 million. Sales were 27% lower than the prior-year quarter's $966 million.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Quarterly periods. Dollar amounts in millions.

EPS details
Non-GAAP EPS came in at $0.50. The 11 earnings estimates compiled by S&P Capital IQ averaged $0.52 per share on the same basis. GAAP EPS of $0.52 for Q3 were 20% lower than the prior-year quarter's $0.65 per share.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Quarterly periods. Figures may be non-GAAP to maintain comparability with estimates.

Margin details
For the quarter, gross margin was 40.4%, 390 basis points better than the prior-year quarter. Operating margin was 23.0%, 450 basis points better than the prior-year quarter. Net margin was 15.0%, 60 basis points better than the prior-year quarter.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Quarterly periods.

Looking ahead
What does the future hold?

Next quarter's average estimate for revenue is $625 million. On the bottom line, the average EPS estimate is $0.38.

Next year's average estimate for revenue is $2.6 billion. The average EPS estimate is $2.05.

Investor sentiment
The stock has a three-star rating (out of five) at Motley Fool CAPS, with 305 members out of 334 rating the stock outperform, and 29 members rating it underperform. Among 94 CAPS All-Star picks (recommendations by the highest-ranked CAPS members), 91 give Constellation Brands a green thumbs-up, and three give it a red thumbs-down.

Of Wall Street recommendations tracked by S&P Capital IQ, the average opinion on Constellation Brands is outperform, with an average price target of $22.80.

  • Add Constellation Brands to My Watchlist.

This Little Company Just Beat Big Media in Court

Broadcast TV will probably never be free again, but at least the cost is coming down. In a potentially landmark decision, a judge in New York ruled that a startup called Aereo can continue to effectively provide low-priced access to major channels for its subscribers. The broadcasters operating those channels had sought a preliminary injunction against Aereo�s activities; the judge�s ruling looks like another small nail in the coffin of high-cost TV.

Cashing in through cable
Broadcast TV operators make the bulk of their revenues through two channels (sorry!) -- advertising and retransmission fees. Commercials are self-explanatory for anyone who�s ever spent more than a few minutes in front of a television set, while retransmission fees are unfamiliar to the bulk of the TV-watching public. Put simply, these are the monies paid by distributors, like cable companies and satellite providers, for the right to carry the channels operated by the broadcasters.

They�re big, big, money, and they�ve been getting bigger. Research firm SNL Kagan estimates that in 2011, News Corp�s Fox, alone, brought in $300 million in retransmission fees. And that company, along with Disney�s (NYSE: DIS  ) ABC, General Electric (NYSE: GE  ) and Comcast�s NBC, CBS, smaller network CW, and top Spanish-language broadcaster Univision, should collectively start to take in around $3 billion annually in the near future.

This is why all of them are really spooked about a service like Aereo. The company, lead-funded by IAC and headed by former Fox TV exec Barry Diller, broadcasts the signals of many of those firms� public stations to its customers. Those customers pay $12 per month for a tiny antenna that connects to their wireless devices. The company�s servers also allow for DVR recording.

What Aereo doesn�t do is pay a red cent to the broadcasters for re-transmitting their content. That�s why those companies are �trying to prevent the upstart from providing the service, through legal moves like the preliminary injunction attempt.

Aereo 1, Broadcasters 0
This is the opening shot of what promises to be a long and bitter legal war between two well-armed and well-financed foes. The broadcaster alliance has plenty of experience fighting content issues, but can that win the day? Look at all the time and expense and legal maneuvering that the content industry has put into stamping out piracy, for example. For all that effort, movie and TV bootlegging is as prevalent as it�s ever been, if not more so.

Besides, the retransmitters have started to fight back with some effectiveness. The current high-profile example is satellite provider DirecTV, which dropped the numerous channels from Viacom that it used to beam, following a dispute over retransmission fees. According to DirecTV, Viacom was seeking a meaty 30% hike in those fees. The blackout was enacted several days ago; as of this writing, the two companies were still arguing about -- er, discussing -- the situation.

Earlier this summer, AMC Networks got into a tiff with the other big satellite provider, Dish Network (Nasdaq: DISH  ) . AMC�s big-ticket item is its signature channel, which features such popular offerings as the 1960s advertising agency drama Mad Men, zombie soap opera The Walking Dead, and is about to launch the final season of the edgy high school teacher-turned-drug kingpin saga, Breaking Bad. Dish�s beef was that AMC Networks was effectively forcing it to carry (and pay for, of course) the broadcaster�s less popular channels, such as IFC and WE tv.

Of course, customers can always ditch the $100-plus subscription fees charged by the satellite and cable providers. Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX  ) , although not quite the high-flying investor darling it once was, is still managing to grow its subscriber base and post black net figures in most of its quarters. It�s got thousands of TV episodes and movies, and subscription fees are a fraction of the cost of cable or satellite. Hulu -- a joint-venture of units operated by GE/Comcast, News Corp and Disney -- charges a mere $7.99 monthly for access to its big and growing slate of TV shows and films.

A tough audience
It�s getting harder to profit from content these days, given the increasing opportunities that end users have to get their entertainment for a few dollars, or even free. The Aereo win is another headache for the media companies, and it could turn into a searing migraine if it�s vindicated in the ensuing court case.

If that happens, look for retransmission fees to nose downwards. The media companies will then have to do what they do best in order to make up for that revenue -- in other words, use their considerable creativity to find new sources of income.

The media fee killers, like Netflix and Hulu, are not the only entities harnessing technology to make a few bucks. We�ve identified a potential big opportunity in tech and, more pointedly, one company that�s very well placed to take advantage of it. Find out what firm that is in our FREE report �The Next Trillion Dollar Revolution,� available for immediate download right over here.

Yahoo!: Activist Third Point Demands Yang Step Down

They’re at it again: those pesky hedgies Third Point LLC, the 5% investor in Yahoo! (YHOO) who have pushed in past for changes to the board of directors, are today urging co-founder and executive director Jerry Yang to step down from the board.

AllThingsD’s Kara Swisher writes this afternoon that Third Point director Daniel Loeb sent a letter to the board accusing Yang of “cronyism” and “self-dealing.” Loeb also expresses dismay at recent media reports that Yang has been mulling a leveraged recapitalization of the firm with the help of private equity. Yang is effectively in conflict, says Loeb, pursuing a sale of part or all of the company while also seeking to be a buyer.

5 Technologies CES 2012 Just Killed

CES gadgets can make 3-D replicas, smarten up your car and make almost all the technology in your house slimmer and flatter, but they can't stop your old tech toys from becoming obsolete.

The CES carnage may not be as clear as it was last year, when a flood of tablets drowned the minor netbook presence on the floor, but the fallout from this year's offerings will be no less pronounced. Judging by the top products at this year's show, integration is still the one constant at CES.That's great for the companies putting five gadgets' worth of functions into products smaller than your fist and consumers whose bandolier of tech products now fits in their back pocket. It's not such great news for companies caught behind the curve or late-adopting consumers waiting for technological advances to pause long enough for them to catch their breath or recoup enough funds to get the next big thing.We took a look at the top trends at CES and found five products that the show effectively bid farewell to in 2012. Their demise may not be immediate, but consider the following products on deathwatch:

Laptop-sized laptopsAs soon as the industry substituted "Ultrabook" for "product that will compete with Apple's(AAPL) MacBook Air" in the tech lexicon, the laptop went on a crash diet. The majority of laptops on the market in 2011 weighed 4.5 pounds or more after resisting the urge to shrink down to netbook size. After H-P(HPQ) launched its super-skinny Envy, Lenovo countered with its svelte IdeaPad U310 and U410 Ultrabooks, notoriously clunky Dell(DELL) dropped weight with its XPS 13 and Acer unveiled an Intel-powered Aspire S5 that it's declared the world's thinnest Ultrabook, the goal weight is now below 3 pounds.The pricing is where it gets tricky. H-P's Envy starts at $1,399, which makes it about $400 more costly than an entry-level MacBook Air. Lenovo's pre-CES X1 Hybrid fetches a slightly less competitive $1,599. The real challenge to Air comes from Lenovo's T430 ThinkPad ($849) and Dell's XPS 13 ($999), which at least inspire some second thought with competitive sticker prices. The old-timer holdouts will grouse about absent optical drives, lightweight memory and heavy reliance on the cloud. But external CD/DVD drives go for as little as $40. Companies such as Seagate and Netgear are making wireless and cloud storage as simple as hard drives. Feel free to hang on to that heavier hardware as long as you'd like, but the portable options for consumers who aren't taken with tablets are getting slimmer.

Slab-sized televisionsThe laptops aren't the only tech devices that resolved to drop a few sizes in 2012.Flatscreen televisions flattened out at CES this year, with the acronym-heavy 55-inch LG 3D OLED packing a brilliant passive 3-D display into a window pane-thin screen. Unlike many of its big-promise television counterparts, though, the LG OLED will actually be consumer-ready by the third quarter. Bang & Olufsen offer a more upmarket option with their slight 65-inch BeoVison 3-D-capable television.The strongest argument for thinning out your television, however, was made by Samsung. Its OLED 55-inch Smart TV is a wispy 0.6 of an inch thin. That's just a throw-in feature.The TV has both voice and facial recognition, motion-control capability and Wi-Fi connectivity.The Smart TV's moneymaker, however, is the ability to upgrade your TV every couple of years when more features become available. Its Smart Evolution allows consumers whose streaming service has gone bankrupt or who are looking for more gadget integration to swap out the old for new via a slot in the back. Spending only a few hundred dollars every few years or so instead of thousands when a TV becomes functionally obsolete is an idea even the most curmudgeonly consumer coarsened by ever-changing television technology can get behind.

Set-top boxesNo offense to Dish Network's(DISH) Hopper DVR, Vizio and Sony(SNE) GoogleTV(GOOG) Blu-ray player and set-top boxes or Simple.TV's DVR, but the days of daisy-chained living room devices are nearing their demise.Samsung's Smart TV is certainly one example of where integration is heading (especially after announcing a partnership with DirecTV(DTV) that cuts out that company's box altogether), but Panasonic is also still pursuing all-in-one television tech. Even peripheral producers such as Roku are getting less boxy, as Roku has streamlined all of its functions into one dongle-sized Streaming Stick that fits into MHL slots on new TVs or HDMI slots on older models with the help of an adapter.The problem has always been that set-top boxes and Internet televisions slip into obsolescence pretty quickly. More adaptive technology could remove that last, clunky obstacle to full integration.

Stand-alone car stereos and GPSAndrew Eisner of gadget-shopping site Retrevo observed that the third-party auto equipment and accessories that were once pervasive in the CES Auto Pavilion have been largely squeezed out by the major auto manufacturers. The reason: Carmakers aren't quite as cool with outsiders getting a cut of their business as they were when car owners were throwing Kenwood triple stacks into their '78 Trans Ams and blaring Boston's More Than A Feeling.There's still a viable stand-alone GPS market and some car tech holdouts such as QNX and its GoogleTV auto apps system and Pioneer's App Radio, but most of the best upgrades are starting to come from in-house.The new Cadillac Cue and Mercedes-Benz @yourService, improving Ford(F) SYNC Applink and evolving General Motors(GM) OnStar technology combine navigation, Bluetooth, emergency and entertainment options while also giving cars proprietary features that shut out all but third-party app developers. They can communicate with a driver's devices, stream content directly and put essential information in a user-friendly, theft-averse package. The message is fairly clear: If you can make fun games, useful tools or better music and talk content delivery via apps, you're welcome to join. If you're making something a guy at an electronics story is going to have to remove existing technology and fumble through wires to install, take it walking.

Your glassesThe reason for adding tech to specs is as clear as the glasses on your face.Our own Gary Krakow came across PixelOptics' emPower! (exclamation point included) electronic corrective glasses and tried out their composite lenses with a thin transparent LCD-like liquid crystal layer, microchips and micro-machine accelerometers. The liquid crystal layer in each lens changed and activated the near focus lens when needed, but came at a $1,200 price that was just a bit too dear for modest budgets."In a quick hands-on test, the system worked as described. A touch of a hidden button near my left temple activated the reading portion of the emPower! glasses. Of course, they weren't made to my prescription, but turning on the circuit did change the bottom of the lenses into a near focus/reading zone."Considering how long it took to get from trifocals to this point, it's a wonder glasses didn't get a tech assist sooner. Then again, the analog versions didn't have built-in batteries that needed recharging at day's end. >To follow the writer on Twitter, go to http://twitter.com/notteham. >To submit a news tip, send an email to: tips@thestreet.com. RELATED STORIES: >>5 Industries In Peril In 2012>>5 Stubornly Standalone Tech Toys>>10 Things You Should Have Bought In 2011Follow TheStreet.com on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook. >To order reprints of this article, click here: Reprints

Oil Prices — What President Obama Doesn’t Understand

If you think gasoline prices are volatile now, stay tuned. President Obama’s plan to clamp down on oil speculators is going to make things worse.

I’m sure you’ve seen the news by now.

The president wants to clamp down on so-called “oil price manipulation” and has proposed a $52 billion plan to increase federal supervision of oil markets.

What the president doesn’t understand is that the oil markets already have this function built in.

Speaking from the Rose Garden last Tuesday, President Obama noted specifically that we can’t afford to have “speculators artificially manipulating markets buy buying up oil, creating the perception of a shortage and driving prices higher – only to flip the oil for a quick profit.”

Evidently, the president hasn’t passed Econ 101.

If he had he would know that prices on everything from eggs to houses are by their very definition self regulating.

Speculation, as opposed to manipulation, is a vital part of the markets – they are not the same thing despite the fact that the president is interchanging the terms.

If prices are too high, people stop buying. If prices are too low, they stop selling. By authorizing $52 billion in oversight, he’s chasing a ghost that he’ll never catch.

The Real Problem with Oil Prices

The real problem is that the United States consumes 20% of the world’s crude but only produces 2%. It comes a time when oil demand is expected to rise more than 25% (to 105 million barrels a day) by 2015, according to a new report titled Oil and Gas: A Global Outlook by Global Industry Analysts, Inc.

If you want the biggest piece of the pie from the deli, you have to pay a premium.

There is no hocus pocus and there’s no additional oversight necessary. Rather, we need to enforce the laws we already have on the books.

Sure the $10 million fines he’s jawboning about (up from $1 million) sound great but they’re really a non-starter. In fact, given that Exxon (NYSE: XOM) alone generated an average of $1.33 billion a day in 2011, they’re little more than an acceptable cost of doing business. Nice try.

Take gasoline, for example.

Prices have jumped 78.2% since the president took office and that doesn’t sit well with the party faithful who are convinced that evil oil price speculators are responsible.

They are distraught that traders put hundreds of billions of dollars into energy every month because that may cause prices to rise.

This is not complicated. Any time there are more buyers than sellers, prices go up. Any time there is more demand than supply, prices go up.

Contrast what’s going on in the oil markets with what’s happening in natural gas.

Prices for natural gas are at ten- year lows. Demand has risen but supply has risen faster. There are more suppliers than buyers. So natural gas prices drop.

Natural gas, by the way, is traded by many of the same traders who trade oil.

    

Oil Price Manipulation, Gas Prices and the Free Market

Gasoline prices at the pump have never been proven to be a direct consequence of oil price manipulation. But it’s widely conjectured.

Believe me, I hate paying more just as much as the next person, but get over it.

Geopolitical tensions, supply constrictions, war, tyrants with spigots and other buyers are the real factors at work and they always have been. When risks go up, so do prices – that’s the way free markets work.

Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)didn’t produce nearly 115 million iPhones and iPads in 2011 for kicks. They did it because there’s huge demand for their products and they can make big bucks.

Things are just more critical now because we’ve failed to develop a comprehensive energy policy over the past 50 years at a time when global demand is increasing rapidly in absolute terms.

The president wants votes in an election year; this is pure political pandering.

For example, China‘s per capital oil consumption has increased by 350% since the early 1980s.

The International Energy Agency estimates that China alone will account for 42% of global oil demand by 2015. And they’re one of the slow growers with consumption rising a mere 100% in the last ten years.

Other countries like Malaysia have seen per capita usage quadruple since the 1960s. Brazil and Thailand have seen oil demand double to 5.7 barrels/year and 4.8 barrels/year per capita.

And don’t forget the weak dollar. Because oil is generally priced in dollars, Bernanke’s weak zero interest rate policies are helping drive prices higher. Producers have to compensate with higher prices to make up the reduction in margin being forced upon them by greenbacks that have diminished purchasing power.

Speaking of which, the Beltway Boys, in their infinite wisdom have got it in their heads that margined trading – meaning you can borrow money to control more of the underlying asset – gives too much power to financial investors aka the speculators.

What they don’t realize is that:

  • Even if you tighten up margin requirements, traders will shift to derivatives like options, swaps and other so-called exotics.
  • Higher margin requirements lead to less liquidity which, in turn, actually exacerbates the speculative volatility they’re trying to control.

Think about it.

Futures markets like those which drive oil and gas prices are a function of two groups of market participants – hedgers and speculators. Those, incidentally are the CFTC’s terms so don’t confuse them with the politically charged versions the p resident is using.

Hedgers are farmers, importers, exporters and manufacturers who depend on consistent pricing to make, sell or otherwise produce something using oil. They participate in the markets in order to keep prices stable to protect against pricing risk. But they can only buy or sell so much. They are actually interested in delivery of the oil or gas they need.

For example, McDonald’s (NYSE:MCD) wants to hedge against rising potato costs that could affect the profitability of its world famous french fries. The farmer who sells them potatoes normally wants to hedge against falling potato prices so as to maximize crop prices and his profit margin.

The position is much the same for Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX) and coffee just as it used to be for dentists and the silver they used for fillings, for example.

Speculators, on the other hand, are those who profit from the price changes against which hedgers are trying to protect themselves. They are not interested in taking delivery.

Speculators serve a very important function in that they bridge the gap between higher and lower prices often buying and selling when hedgers can’t or won’t.

If speculators are taken out of the picture, prices become less liquid and more jumpy.

Instead of moving smoothly from $100 to $120 a barrel, for instance, oil prices might simply gap higher because hedgers will be forced to trade directly with each other or through intermediaries who have effectively got their financial hands tied.

This would back all the way through the gasoline refinery process to the pump.

And investors who are dumfounded by the price increases we’ve seen so far, may be absolutely gob fobbed when things jump $1 or more at a time. Then there really would be a link.

Shutting down speculators would be like banning ice cream delivery trucks in July.

The President is Chasing a Ghost He Can’t Catch

To think that oil companies will not shift to other pricing mechanisms is na�ve. If U.S. markets are restricted, traders will simply shift to London or Shanghai and conduct business as usual using new contracts structured specifically to avoid additional U.S. regulation.

They will also create trading entities that act as a proxy for the “speculators” the White House has targeted in this latest gambit.

This is exactly what many did with credit default s waps after the United States clamped down on them.

Why do you think funds shunted to London are at the heart of the MF Global fiasco or Goldman’s most aggressive traders are located there? Because money goes where it’s treated best. There are more accommodative regulations in the land of crumpets.

We don’t need more regulation. We need to enforce what we have. This is another misguided political con job drawn from the well of bad ideas.

The p resident says he wants cheap gas, yet he kills the Keystone Pipeline, stymies drilling and allows the Fed to engineer a bailout of that put trillions into the system over the past four years – every dollar of which makes gas more expensive.

He says he wants to rein in speculators while not drawing a line between what constitutes legitimate speculation (as a function of free markets) and already illegal manipulation.
If anything, the f ederal government is the biggest manipulator in the history of manipulators.

Quantitative easing has done more damage to gas prices and the wallets of millions of consumers than a few speculators ever could. Frankly, it’s a miracle prices aren’t $10 a gallon at the pump by now.

I say let the markets work. Prosecute the true oil price manipulators but otherwise quit meddling. Piling on more regulation will only detract from economic activity, not create it.

Oh…and by the way, investors need to stay long energy especially in growing economies using more fuel.

Higher oil prices mean higher oil profits and there is a link between rising fuel consumption and GDP growth.

10/30/2012

Collar The ConocoPhillips Hefty Dividend

Sometimes you just feel good about a company and its stock and then you just noticed it pays also pays 3.62 percent in dividends. This would certainly grab my attention. Specifically, I am speaking of ConocoPhillips(COP). The reason I like this stock fundamentally is because it is undervalued on every key metric. The forward p/e is just over 8.25 and its book value 49.56. The upcoming split-off of the Refining and Exploration is a positive for the stock.

Having said that, I believe the stock has a high probability of closing north of here by year's end. As such, I could take advantage of the high dividend payout of $2.64. One strategy I would consider is to buy COP stock and placing a protective collar on the stock through puts and calls. The collar requires selling a call and a buying a put as well. I prefer an at-the-money, or just out-of-the money call and buying a just out-of-the money put.

There are a couple of drawbacks involved with this strategy. First, if the stock really takes off you will not participate in the upside as you are "collared". Also, if COP does jump too soon too fast your short calls may be assigned prematurely thus stripping you of your stock and the dividends.

Some investors would question this strategy as they would prefer to just outright own the stock. I prefer to minimize my risks as any unforeseen event can sideswipe any thesis, no matter how bulletproof it may seem to be.

The analysis below demonstrates several scenarios using different variations of August options coupled with the purchase of stock.

Scenario I (Least Aggressive)
Purchasing 100 shares of COP stock @ 72.80, selling 1 Aug. 72.5 Calls @ 3.95 and buying 1 Aug. 70 Puts @ 4.20

At August Expiration
COP PriceCOP P&LCall P&LPut P&LDiv*Tot. P&L
65-$780+$395+$80+$198-$107
67.5-$530+$395-$170+$198-$107
70-$280+$395-$420+$198-$107
72.5-$30+$395-$420+$198+$143
75+$220+$145-$420+$198+$143
77.5+$470-$105-$420+$198+$143

Scenario II (Aggressive)
Purchasing 100 shares of COP stock @ 72.80, selling 1 Aug. 72.5 Calls @ 3.95 and buying 1 Aug. 67.5 Puts @ 3.30

At August Expiration
COP PriceCOP P&LCall P&LPut P&LDiv*Tot. P&L
65-$780+$395-$80+$198-$267
67.5-$530+$395-$330+$198-$267
70-$280+$395-$330+$198-$17
72.5-$30+$395-$330+$198+$233
75+$220+$145-$330+$198+$233
77.5+$470-$105-$330+$198+$233

Scenario III (More Aggressive)
Purchasing 100 shares of COP stock @ 72.80, selling 1 Aug. 75 Calls @ 3.00 and buying 1 Aug. 67.5 Puts @ 3.30

At August Expiration
COP PriceCOP P&LCall P&LPut P&LDiv*Tot. P&L
65-$780+$300-$80+$198-$362
67.5-$530+$300-$330+$198-$362
70-$280+$300-$330+$198-$112
72.5-$30+$300-$330+$198+$138
75+$220+$300-$330+$198+$388
77.5+$470+$50-$330+$198+$388

*Dividend = $198 (3 x .66 Feb 16, Est. May 18, Est. July 20)

As the tables above illustrate, even with collars a trader can scale his or her risk. One could use any variation of options thereof to finer tune his/her risk tolerance.

On a final note, the company has stated its intention to continue to grow the payout, so a bump in dividend payout can further enhance this constructed trade.

Disclosure: I am long COP.

Top Stocks For 2012-2-7-13

DrStockPick.com Stock Report!

Monday September 14, 2009

Stocks Upgraded Today

CompanyTickerBrokerage FirmRatings ChangePrice Target
PolyOnePOLBB&T Capital MktsHold � Buy
EmulexELXCanaccord AdamsHold � Buy
AeroVironmentAVAVDougherty & CompanyNeutral � Buy$26 � $34
BMC SoftwareBMCMKM PartnersNeutral � Buy$34 � $43
SusserSUSSMorgan JosephHold � Buy$14
Hecla MiningHLRBC Capital MktsUnderperform � Sector Perform
Corinthian CollegesCOCOArgusHold � Buy$25
ZoranZRANNeedhamHold � Buy$15
BiovailBVFCredit SuisseNeutral � Outperform
UPSUPSCredit SuisseUnderperform � Neutral$48 � $61
Dreamworks AnimationDWAWilliam BlairMkt Perform � Outperform
Compton PetroleumCMZCIBC Wrld MktsSector Underperform � Sector Perform
MicrosoftMSFTAuriga U.S.AHold � Buy$24 � $30
Fidelity SouthernLIONSun Trust Rbsn HumphreyReduce � Neutral
ETRADEETFCCitigroupHold � Buy$1.50 � $2.30
Computer SciencesCSCKaufman BrosHold � Buy$54 � $62
Cognizant TechCTSHKaufman BrosHold � Buy$42 � $45
Thomson ReutersTRIDeutsche SecuritiesSell � Buy
Telefonica S.A.TEFDeutsche SecuritiesHold � Buy
NetezzaNZRoth CapitalHold � Buy$10 � $14

Stocks Downgraded Today

CompanyTickerBrokerage FirmRatings ChangePrice Target
Schnitzer SteelSCHNLongbowNeutral � Sell$42
Waste MgtWMCredit SuisseOutperform � Neutral$33
Coeur d’Alene MinesCDERBC Capital MktsSector Perform � Underperform
First SolarFSLRSoleilHold � Sell$170 � $96
Consolidated Comms IllinoisCNSLSoleilBuy � Hold$14.50 � $15
Cabela’sCABJP MorganNeutral � Underweight$16 � $10
Allegheny EnergyAYEJefferies & CoBuy � Hold$29 � $28

Big Banks Are Safer: Poll

Thinking about closing your account with your big, bad bank? Does that mean you are placing a greater premium on service over safety?

TheStreet's readers said last month in a popular poll that they would leave Bank of America(BAC) over the $5 debit-card fee But some readers agree that when it comes to keeping their money safe, they would rather bet on a bank that is too big-to-fail. In a poll conducted by TheStreet last week, 84% of 146 readers said they would rather put entrust money with a big player that is tightly regulated, than risk losing their money with smaller firms that tend to escape regulatory scrutiny. Clearly, when most people are asked to make a choice between safety and service, they will probably choose the former, so the poll results aren't particularly surprising.But it does show why big banks like Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase(JPM) are not too worried about reports of customers abandoning them on Bank Transfer Day. People who have a lot of money to lose, like companies and high-networth individuals, are likely to stay put with their big banks. The failure of MF Global(MFGLQ.PK) may not have posed a risk to the financial system but it has raised concerns about whether smaller firms that fly below the regulatory radar are the best place to put your money. Two weeks after the broker-dealer filed for bankruptcy, there is still no word on what happened to more than $600 million that has gone "missing" from the firm's customer segregated accounts. Regulators are investigating whether MF violated a basic rule that requires companies to keep client money separate from the firm's own in order to protect clients' assets. Now MF's clients and creditors are battling each other as each party tries to recover their money first in the bankruptcy process. The incident has reinforced calls for regulation of risky practices by proponents of regulation such as the Volcker rule. Such regulations might limit the ability of big banks to generate high returns to their shareholders. But with regulators breathing down their necks, too-big-to-fail banks are less likely to flout basic rules, such as segregating customer accounts.

Those who choose to bank with smaller players will likely have better service. But they will have to do their due diligence when it comes to ensuring that deposits are insured, trading accounts are protected, that the firm is in compliance with regulations and that the regulator has its eye on the ball.

>To follow the writer on Twitter, go to http://twitter.com/shavenk.>To submit a news tip, send an email to: tips@thestreet.com. >To order reprints of this article, click here: Reprints

Could High Oil Prices Derail Overvalued Stock Markets? 5 Hedge Ideas

"In China the question is not price subsidies, the question is about first time drivers," warned Jeff Rubin, the former Chief Economist of CIBC World Markets. Rubin argues that the Chinese have surpassed the United States in car sales and coal consumption, and will not stop driving anytime soon-- regardless of higher oil. Rubin postulates that as higher oil prices restrain demand for gasoline for U.S. drivers, these higher oil and gas prices will not hinder demand by Chinese drivers who have no price memory of oil (moving from bicycle to cars) and who are only now hitting the roads in large numbers.

Rubin also argues that the world is not running out of oil, but that the world is running out of cheap oil at an alarming rate. Canadian oil sands and other non conventional oil supplies are plentiful but they rely on $200 a barrel oil. Rubin suggests that the collapse of subprime and housing markets in the U.S. were not the only cause of the recession and that an oil price shock was partly or largely to blame for the last recession, when oil touched $147 a barrel in mid 2008.

Rubin thinks we are headed for higher oil prices and for another economic downturn from the next oil shock that he believes is coming very soon (with the protests around the globe centered around high inflation, this may already be developing).

Here is the video in which he explains why oil prices are so important to the Global economy and why big changes must me made to prepare for the next oil shock.

Here are 5 option ideas to hedge your portfolio against higher oil prices and a potential oil shock.

  • RJI -- Currently I am long 50 RJI June $8 calls for $1.6 or so per contract.
  • Seadrill Limited (SDRL) -- I am considering selling the Jan. 2012 SDRL $35 Put options for $3.8 per contract (the stock is currently trading at $38 per share)
  • Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) boasts one of the largest reserve / market cap ratios in the oil sands and the company is highly profitable at current oil prices. I am looking to sell the Jan. 2012 $45 put options for $4.4 per contract. The current prict of CNQ is $49.7, so this investment carries a nearly 20% margin of safety for our option position, while the return on our risk (that CNQ falls below $40.60 at expiration) is 10.8% over that time period.
  • Diamond Offshore (DO) trades for just 11.5X TTM earnings and is one of the stronger offshore drillers in the world. The January 2012 $74.50 Puts can be sold for $8.2 per contract or a return of 12% on our risk (that DO falls below $66.3 at expiration).
  • JA Solar (JASO) is likely to benefit from higher oil and coal prices. As the low cost provider in its market, this company could see increased profits and demand with higher oil prices. The June 2011 $7 puts can be sold for $.75 per contract or a 12% return on your risk by June expiration, or a 20% plus annualized return on investment. JASO currently trades at $7.37 giving our investment a 15% margin of safety from today's prices (meaning the stock has to fall 15% by June for the trade to lose money).


Remember that one of two events could happen in commodity markets that could potentially damage equity markets:

  • Stagflation could result from higher commodity prices not being passed through to consumers who are still hurting from high unemployment and low wage growth.
  • Oil prices could fall sharply, setting off a correction in all risk assets as leveraged players wind down margined positions.

My personal thinking is to remain either flat or bearish on equities and long a diversified basket of commodities as a "long hedge" until a definite collapse is apparent. In any futures or macro trade, experienced trend followers will tell you that cutting losses quickly is tremendously important -- the same can be said of stock positions, but remember that an undervalued stock that goes down may represent an even better long term investment after a price drop as the discount to intrinsic value increases with the fall in stock price. Over many years, stocks tend to perform well as they accrue earnings and book value grows with profits even if the company exhibits little to no growth in revenues and earnings.This is why short selling is more speculative (along with unlimited losses) but can be utilized when overall markets become extremely overbought and overvalued (as the Russell 2000 is today, in my opinion).

With the RSI, Stochastics, and MACD on the already overvalued stock markets at extremely overbought levels, I would not be surprised to see a 10% correction from current prices... The 50 day looks to be in play in the futures markets at some point this week and the next stop on the break of the 50 day would likely be the 200 day moving average.

Being cautious and conservative should pay off as the price shock of $99 a barrel oil will start to hit the economy in negative ways. Remember that $147 a barrel oil came at a time when homeowners were flush with refinanced cash and stocks were still at lofty valuations and price levels. The consumer had a much better balance sheet (almost 1/3 better), so that this time around the effects of high oil and food prices are obviously much worse on market participants and consumers than in 2008.

Furthermore, most retail investors are not anywhere near back to even after swearing off the stock market in March of 2009 and abandoning a buy and hold strategy. Many of the same investors are only getting back into the market now, at prices 90% higher than where they sold at the bottom a couple of years ago.

In conclusion, higher oil and gasoline prices are stifling the economies of the world, and stagflation is a real possibility for the economy which would make stocks a tough place to make money, while government programs and large deficits could continue to fuel the rally in commodities, which many view as speculative. Of course, a good degree of speculation is certainly at play right now in commodities, but the fact that those calling the boom in hard assets "speculative" while the U.S. has become the largest debtor nation in the world always seems to be absent from any discussion on higher oil, gold, or food prices. Paper currencies under a system which cannot sustain entitlement spending programs are likely a culprit behind much of the rally in non-paper assets besides residential real estate. The rally in farmland-- and raw land in general-- tends to back the paper currency devaluation thesis as well...

In any event, my feeling is that debt is the real driver of commodity prices over the long term as well as the end of easy to find light sweet crude oil, as discussed in the above video. Either way, buckle your seat belts as we are in for some wild trading in all listed markets.

Disclosure: I am long JASO, RJI, DO, RJI, GLD, PSLV.

Could China Be Forced to Plunge the World Into Global Recession by 2015?

Bloombergon Sunday, Jan. 30 cited a 28-page report entitled The Financial Crisis of 2015: An Avoidable Historyby Barrie Wilkinson, a London-based partner at consulting firm Oliver Wyman.

The report describes a scenario--spanned 2013 to 2015--when Western QE-induced inflation brings down China, creating a debt crisis in the commodity sector--inclusive of resource-dependent countries as well as commodity producers--which eventually plunge the world into another recession, and a new world order by 2015.

"...the dramatic rises in commodities prices resulting from loose Western monetary policies eventually caused rampant inflation in China. China was forced to raise interest rates and appreciate its currency to bring inflation under control."

Well, I think we are pretty much there already.

"Once the Chinese economy began to slow, investors quickly realized that the demand for commodities was unsustainable. Combined with the massive oversupply that had built up during the boom, this led to a collapse of commodities prices."

Although I see this as low probability, I can't totally dismiss it. That is why global markets always sold off whenever there was news about China.

"Having borrowed to finance expensive development projects, the commodities-rich countries in Latin America and Africa and some of the world’s leading mining companies were suddenly the focus of a new debt crisis."

Click to enlarge

Tiffany: Asian Luxury Demand Waning, Says CLSA

Tiffany (TIF) could struggle over the next couple of quarters, as the company faces difficult year-over year sales comparisons and could see sales slip in China and Korea, CLSA analyst Barbara Wyckoff wrote.

Wyckoff downgraded shares to Outperform from Buy.

Luxury sales were weak in Korea and China in April, Wyckoff asserts, and her channel checks show that U.S. jewelry sales “stalled” last month.

She expects comparable store sales to decline in the first and second quarters, but improve in the third quarter and reach mid-single-digit growth by the fourth quarter.

The comp sales slowdown could quickly hit EPS.

“We have stress tested the TIF model. What is clear is that as comp sales slow, earnings quickly reflect the lack of leverage on TIF�s high fixed costs. Approximately 80% of Tiffany�s expenses in SG&A are fixed (occupancy and corporate). Manufacturing, distribution, the merchandising and diamond divisions are the fixed components in cost of goods sold.”

Options FAQ: Technical Information

Technical Information Questions

  • How do you measure volatility?
  • Can you explain what the term “Zeta” means?
  • What is happening when an option’s premium seems to disappear?
  • What is a put/call ratio and how is it used?
  • Can you please help me understand what is the meaning of “skew” in options?
  • What does the term “delta” mean?
  • Where can I find option delta values on the internet?
  • I tried to enter a limit order to buy an option for $3.15. My order was rejected due to entering an incorrect price. What was wrong with the price I entered?
  • Are there any procedures in place for how options and strikes are listed?
  • A few weeks ago, the only expiration months available for trading for Lucent Technologies options were January 2004 and January 2005. Now there are more available months. Why did they suddenly list more months?
  • How is an equity options’ opening price determined? Is it set by the market-maker or specialist prior to the market open? Is it based on the first trade of the day?
  • Is there a list of optionable ETFs?
Technical Information Answers

Q: How do you measure volatility?

A: Volatility literally represents the standard deviation of day-to-day price changes in a security, expressed as an annualized percentage. Two measures of volatility are commonly used in options trading: historical and implied. Historical volatility depicts the degree of price change in an underlying security observed over a specified period of time using standard statistical measures. It is not a forecast of future volatility. Implied volatility is the market’s prediction of expected volatility, which is indirectly calculated from current options prices using an option-pricing model. The exact formula for historical volatility is:

Q: Can you explain what the term “Zeta” means?

A: Zeta is the market value of an option, less its model value using the at-the-money implied volatility for the same expiration. It is a measure of the importance of using the volatility smile, rather than only ATM volatility. A nice dictionary of derivatives terms can be found at http://www.margrabe.com/Dictionary.html.

Source: Howard Savery, “Quantifying Volatility Convexity,” Derivatives Strategy, 2/2000, pp. 54-55.

 

Q: I am perplexed when the option premium disappears from my options. I paid $6.40 for a $20 call with two years until expiration when the stock was trading at $20/share. Now the stock is above $50, but the premium has totally disappeared. The option still has 18 months to expiration and I don�t understand why the premium went away so quickly, it seems like I lost $6.40 somewhere.

A: What you have described is the phenomenon of delta. Delta is defined as the ratio of the theoretical price change of the option to the price change of the underlying stock. The rule of thumb is that an at-the-money option has a delta of approximately 50%. Since your call option was right at-the-money when you bought it, for each $1 that the stock went up your option increased by 50 cents. As the stock continued to increase, so did the value of the option, but ALWAYS AT A SLOWER RATE THAN THE STOCK.

At some point the delta of your option approached 100% and it began to move at the same rate as the stock. But during that time, the movement of the stock outpaced that of the option by $6.40, the amount of your premium. If the stock fell back toward $20 the process would reverse itself and you would see some time value premium reappear.

 

Q: What is a put/call ratio and how is it used?

A: The put-call ratio is simply the number of puts traded divided by the number of calls traded. It can be computed daily, weekly, or over any time period. It can be computed for stock options, index options, or future options. Some market technicians suspect that a high volume of puts relative to calls indicates investors are bearish, whereas a high ratio of calls to puts shows bullishness.

Many market technicians find the put-call ratio to be a good contrary indicator, meaning when the ratio is high, market bottom is near, and when the ratio is low, a market top is imminent. The more highly traded options contracts produce a more reliable put-call ratio. Traders and investors generally buy more calls than puts where stock options are concerned. Therefore, the equity put-call ratio is a number far less than 1.00. If call buying is heavy, the equity put-call ratio may dip into the .30 range on a daily basis. Very bearish days may occasionally produce numbers of 1.00 or higher. An average day will produce a ratio of around .50 – .70.

Once again, the numbers are interpretive numbers. Here are some numbers that may be used for illustrative purposes:

Index P/C Ratio

  • Bullish: 1.5 or higher
  • Bearish: .75 or lower
  • Neutral: .75-1.5

Equity P/C Ratio

  • Bullish: .75-1
  • Bearish: .4 or lower
  • Neutral: .4-.6

Put/Call ratio information can be obtained by going to Daily Put/Call Ratio or the Volume Query on the Options Clearing Corporation’s web site.

 

Q: Can you please help me understand what is the meaning of “skew” in options?

A: The basic idea behind skew is that options with different strike prices and different expirations tend to trade at different implied volatilities. When implied volatilities for options with the same expiration are plotted, the graph resembles a smile, with at-the-money volatility in the middle and out-of-the-money options forming the gently-rising sides. As options go into the money they gradually approach their intrinsic value, and an option trading at its intrinsic value has an implied volatility of zero, so for our graph we use call prices for strikes above the current underlying stock price and put prices for strikes below the current underlying stock price.

There is a mathematical reason that skew appears as the “volatility smile” described above: most option pricing models assume stock prices are log-normally distributed, but in the real world stock prices deviate slightly from that model. Specifically, the Normal Distribution underestimates the probability of extremely large moves. In order to compensate, traders ‘tweak’ their models by using a higher volatility for out-of-money options.

But the skew also holds valuable information. An investor who takes the time and effort to carefully analyze the skew of a stock�s options can gain important insights into how the market is pricing risk. In some cases, for example, the perceived downside risk may be greater than the perceived upside risk, which causes the graph to be more of a ‘smirk’ than a ‘smile.’

 

Q: What does the term “delta” mean?

A: A measure of the rate of change in an option’s theoretical value for a one-unit change in the price of the underlying stock.

For example if the delta of a call option is 50 (or .50 to be more precise), for each one point move in the stock, the anticipated movement of the option would be a half point – or 50%.

(The delta would be described in negative percentages for puts as the movement is opposite.)

 

Q: Where can I find option delta values on the internet?

A: Delta is one of the options greeks that is derived from an option pricing module. Delta, normally expressed as a percentage, seeks to measure the rate of change in an options’ theoretical value for a one-unit (i.e. $1) change in the price of the underlying security or index. There are a couple of ways to obtain the “delta” of an option.

  • From the OptionsEducation.org homepage, you can click on the menu link titled “Quotes”. Enter a symbol and under “Apply to:”, select “Detailed Options Chains.” The option’s Greeks (including the delta), will be listed in the table below.
  • You can also solve for the option delta using our options calculator. There is an options pricing calculator under the “Tool and Literature” link on our website. This calculator is available in Basic, Advanced, or Cycles format. First time users are encouraged to review the Basic calculator as there are discussions on the various inputs necessary to calculate an options’ theoretical pricing.

 

Q: I tried to enter a limit order to buy an option for $3.15. My order was rejected due to entering an incorrect price. What was wrong with the price I entered?

A: Unless the underlying security is part of the penny pilot program, minimum increments for premiums below $3.00 are quoted in nickel (.05) increments. Premiums for $3.00 and above are quoted in dime (.10) increments. In reference to the question, a correct limit order price might be either $3.10 or $3.20. To read more about options quoting in penny increments, refer to this FAQ: http://optionseducation.org/help/faq/general.jsp.

 

Q: Are there any procedures in place for how options and strikes are listed?

A: Yes � and you can read the current Options Listing Procedures Plan (OLPP) here: http://www.optionsclearing.com/clearing/industry-services/olpp.jsp

 

Q: A few weeks ago, the only expiration months available for trading for Lucent Technologies options were January 2004 and January 2005. Now there are more available months. Why did they suddenly list more months? (Updated 11/03)

A: When a stock closes below three dollars per share, the option exchanges are prohibited from adding new months and strikes. However, because Lucent recently closed above three dollars per share the exchanges were permitted to add new series. Lucent options are also part of the $1 strike pilot program.

Follow this link for a list of available series and strikes.

 

Q: How is an equity options’ opening price determined? Is it set by the market-maker or specialist prior to the market open? Is it based on the first trade of the day?

A: The “opening price” is simply the first reported trade in the option contract in question. You have to be careful, though. It’s quite possible that the first trade of the day could take place 3 seconds, 10 minutes, 30 minutes or even an hour after the opening bell. In some cases, an option contract might not trade for several hours, days or even weeks! Perhaps you’re wondering when the opening QUOTE for an option contract can occur? If this is the case, the answer is that opening quotes can take place as soon as the underlying security has opened on a primary exchange during regular trading hours – after 8:30 a.m. Central Time.

FYI, Equity options trading hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. (Central Time). Options on Exchange-Traded-Funds (ETFs) that are based on a broad-based index will generally trade from 8:30 a.m. to 3:15 p.m. (Central Time).

 

Q: Is there a list of optionable ETFs?

A: Yes, you may find them here:� ETF Options Specifications.

Saudi prince purchases $300 million stake in Twitter

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal said Monday that he and his investment firm, Kingdom Holding Company, are purchasing a $300 million stake in Twitter.

The billionaire prince said the investment was made after "several months of negotiations" and would represent "a strategic stake" in the microblogging service.

"We believe that social media will fundamentally change the media industry landscape in the coming years. Twitter will capture and monetize this positive trend," KHC executive director of private equity and international investments Ahmed Halawani said in a press release.

The prince's Twitter shares were bought on the secondary market, according to Fortune reporter Dan Primack -- which means that Twitter didn't directly recieve any of the cash.

While it's unclear how much control Alwaleed's investment will provide, the prince's investment firm looks to become long-term investors in its portfolio investments and "seeks to work closely with the management of those companies and participate in strategic decisions," according to its site.

With a reported net worth of $21.3 billion, Prince Alwaleed has topped Arabian Business's Arab Rich list for eight consecutive years.

Alwaleed's investment firm, KHC, owns a 7% stake in News Corporation (NWS) along with a host of high-profile investments, including a 29.9% stake in Saudi Research and Marketing Group. KHC's other investments include CNNMoney parent company Time Warner (TWX, Fortune 500), Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500) and Citigroup (C, Fortune 500). Alwaleed also has plans to launch a privately owned news channel.

The Saudi prince invested in Citigroup in the early 1990s, when the financial services giant was reeling from a capital crunch. Since then, the billionaire has invested in a host of technology and media companies.

A significant stakeholder in News Corp., Alwaleed defended Rubert Murdoch and the company's future this year amid accusations that the paper had hacked into the voice mail accounts of thousands of people.

"I interact with News Corp and I see a lot of depth at the management level, and at all levels," he told CNN's Piers Morgan in July.

What's really behind Twitter's staff exodus

The Saudi prince is the latest power player to bet that fast-growing Twitter will transform itself into a profitable business.

In August, the five-year-old social media company raised a "significant" funding round led by venture firm DST Global. The company amended its certificate of incorporation forms to authorize the issuance of up to 25 million new shares, priced at just over $16 per share. That would let the company raise around $400 million in new funding. Multiple reports pegged the company's valuation at $8 billion after the funding round.

With nearly 800 employees -- and around 100 hired in the last month -- Twitter is undergoing a transformation. After management shakeups and an exodus of early employees, the company is bolstering its engineering team and focusing on expanding its reach.

Twitter, along with Facebook, is being closely watched for signs that it may look to file for an initial public offering.

Several social media firms have gone public this year, including LinkedIn (LNKD) and Groupon (GRPN) -- but both stocks cooled after their first day of trading. And last Friday, shares of social gaming company Zynga (ZNGA) fell on their first day. 

These Two Emerging Markets Just Got A Lot More Enticing

With U.S. economic growth on the wane and the European Union (EU) on the brink of collapse, there's never been a better time to increase your exposure to emerging markets.

And two fast-growing developing economies just became a lot more enticing.

I'm talking about Colombia and South Korea - both of which just signed free trade agreements (FTAs) with the United States.

Both treaties date back to the last days of the Bush administration - when bilateral trade deals were fashionable - but had gotten hung up in Congress.

To some extent, free trade agreements merely deflect trade from other paths. However, since the EU has signed a trade deal with South Korea and is negotiating one with Colombia, there are both defensive and trade-building reasons for these deals.

South Korea is a trillion-dollar economy and one of the United States' most important trading partners, with two-way trade totaling $74 billion in 2008. And Colombia's potential as a trading partner is enhanced by its geographical position - close to both the East and West Coast U.S. markets.

Both countries are growing quite fast. In fact, Colombia is expected to clock growth of more than 5% in 2011 and 2012.

The Biggest BeneficiariesThe South Korean deal offers the most potential to U.S. exporters, as the deal is expected to add about $10 billion to U.S. exports and gross domestic product (GDP).

U.S. exporters of agricultural products, which are projected to double from their current $2.8 billion, will be the primary beneficiaries. However, U.S. auto manufacturers and banks will also have a chance to break into the market.

On the other side, Korean exporters of cars, trucks and computer equipment will benefit from better access to the U.S. market.

Colombia has a thriving agricultural sector, but U.S. meat exports should jump significantly. Pork exports, for example, are forecast to grow 72%. IT companies and chemicals producers also will gain improved access to the Colombian market. But the greatest potential will be unlocked in the heavy equipment sector, as Colombia races to develop its mineral resources.

Reduced sanitary inspection barriers will improve the trade flow both ways. That will increase demand for Colombian coffee and flowers. But the big breakthrough will be in Colombia's energy sector, as the country's oil is an increasingly important export to the United States.

Now let's take a look at some of the specific companies that will cash in on these deals.

Of the big U.S. companies that stand to gain from the new FTAs, Tyson Foods Inc. (NYSE: TSN) and Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE: CAT) are in the most promising position.

Tyson Foods is the largest U.S. poultry producer. It also owns the largest beef producer, Iowa Beef Producers. Tyson is a $7 billion company with a price/earnings (P/E) ratio of 8.8, which means it's reasonably well valued.

Caterpillar should benefit, as well - especially from increased demand from Colombia's extraction sectors. Of course, it's a $54 billion company trading at 14-times earnings, so it's pricier.

Playing foreign companies is a little trickier, but there are still some good options available to U.S. investors.

Samsung Electronics Ltd. Co. (PINK: SSNLF) and Hyundai Motor Co. (PINK: HYMTF), the two most obvious Korean beneficiaries of the FTA, are quoted only on the Pink Sheets and trade very thinly.

For that reason, I think you're better off with the iShares MSCI South Korea Index Fund (NYSE: EWY). It has a $3.5 billion capitalization and a P/E of 6.76. This exchange-traded fund (ETF) should do well considering the recently-signed FTA is expected to give a 0.6% annual bump to Korea's economic growth. South Korea recently signed an FTA with the EU, as well.

As far as Colombia goes, the most obvious beneficiary is Ecopetrol SA (NYSE ADR: EC). The Bogota-based oil company is expanding rapidly as a result of Colombia's very attractive offshore and onshore oil deposits. It has a market cap of $84 billion and a P/E of 12.

As with South Korea, this FTA should increase U.S. investment in Colombia and further speed the country's already rapid growth. The largest ETF, the Global X FTSE Colombia 20 ETF (NYSE: GXG) is thus a good bet. It has a market capitalization of $135 million and a P/E of 17.

There is one more company that will benefit, and it by far is the best choice for U.S. investors. It's a big-time exporter that's beginning to get a lot of attention from company insiders. And even though it's strung together five consecutive profitable quarters, the stock remains relatively cheap.

However, I'm saving this one for Money Morning Private Briefing subscribers. If you're already a member, then my in-depth analysis of this company was made available to you this morning. If not, then you can sign up to get this pick and access to dozens of others by clicking here.

The Inflation Protected Portfolio: Newmont And Goldcorp

My clients have income needs that are lasting longer and longer so it's reasonable that I think about inflation. I'm not interested in getting bogged down in the causes, or even the effects of inflation. Let's just put it out there that inflation is a certainty and needs to be handled with some wisdom by investors.

The stock market is a good place to get inflation protection if your time frame is long. It's very nature causes it to re-value constantly. Getting more specific than the broad market we can look to sectors that are very sensitive to inflation. Companies dealing in products with intrinsic value like oil and gas are good examples. Food, timber and medical services are good examples as well. But the gold sector is best. Gold has historical intrinsic value, it can be evenly divided and not lose value, it's portable on a financial scale that matters to everyday life and most important, gold carries no counter party risk.

I'm not a 'gold bug' at all, but I have found it important to put a percentage of each client's investments in gold companies. Since I focus on dividends for income Newmont (NEM) is a clear leader for this. I also use Goldcorp (GG) to further broaden a portfolio.

Newmont snapshot from Morningstar.com:

(click to enlarge)

Goldcorp snapshot below from Morningstar.com:

(click to enlarge)

Newmont is sitting at a 2.78% yield and Goldcorp is sitting at 1.37% yield. Both of these companies have raised their dividends substantially as the price of gold has increased over the past 6-8 years. Goldcorp has the smaller yield but investors enjoy the monthly payment.

These yields are small and by no means can they be expected to hold up a large percentage of a portfolio designed to pay your living expenses. However, the price of gold company stock is very sensitive to inflation. Both these companies surged Friday as you can see from the snapshots. I believe that the weak jobs report has convinced the market that stimulus via monetary easing (inflation) is coming. Hence the big move in gold and gold stocks.

My current allocation in precious metal is sitting at 8-10% for high income seeking clients. Lower income, growth oriented clients have an allocation of 12-15%. The price metrics for gold stocks are pretty solid right now. However, a deeper look is always a good idea for the gold market. It is a market surrounded by many strong feelings and not as much wise advice. Gold producers are always under the cost squeeze to get these ounces out of the ground and the politics are a wild card. Newmont has margins that are falling and Goldcorp is having some production volume issues but these are well run companies in a tough business.

An alternative to GG and NEM could be Silver Wheaton (SLW). This is a very interesting company. SLW is made up of perpetual purchase contracts for silver byproduct from (mostly) large lead, copper and tin mines. The contracts were put in place at much lower silver prices so current profits are high. Silver Wheaton has announced a dividend policy that will payout based on cash flow from sales (read about it here). The payout will be directly related to the price of silver. The SLW dividend will function with some of the characteristics of U.S.-based oil and gas trusts such as Permian Basin Trust (PBT) or San Juan Basin Trust (SJT).

Protecting a structured portfolio and income from inflation is very important. Rising dividends help, and having some gold is a good idea. If you can do both at the same time, well that's even better.

Disclosure: I am long GG, NEM, PBT.

10/29/2012

George Soros: Great Depression is Looming


In a verbal attack against the ways in which Angela Merkel –German Chancellor – is handling Europe’s debt crisis, George Soros again warns of further disaster on the way…

Another Great Depression may lie right around the corner, says Soros.

If Merkel continues to insist merely on increasing spending cuts rather than injecting funds into the system, she may inadvertently re-create a scenario all too similar to the mistakes that brought about the Great Depression in America back in 1929.

Running out of things to cut, Europe is running out of ways to stay afloat. Angry protestors have resorted to rioting and violence turning a sour economy into an unpredictable ball of chaos and anarchy.

Admiring Ms. Merkel’s leadership, Soros still speculates that she is pushing Europe in the wrong direction.

According to Soros, it was a grave mistake to offer Greece a bailout option tied to high interest rates.

"That's why the country can't be saved today, and the same thing will happen to Italy if we put this country in the straitjacket of paying harsh interest rates," Soros said.

A Greek default would cause an escalation of the crisis and could lead to a run on Italian and Spanish banks, and "Europe would explode," he said.

Moreover, Soros asserts that Europe may be able to deal with the crisis without additonal aid from the International Monetary Fund if they shift their recovery-focus and stick to principle that won't completely devastate the people…

 

BRCM, MRVL: Benchmark Says Hold; Semi Recovery Priced In

The Benchmark Company’s Gary Mobley this morning cut his rating on the semiconductor industry from Overweight to Market weight, writing that “an upward inflection in a semiconductor mini cycle is already priced into the sector.”

Mobley also cut his rating on Broadcom (BRCM) to Hold from Buy, and the same for shares of Marvell Technology Group (MRVL), arguing both stocks have priced in that recovery.

The time to buy into chips was when the “fear factor is greatest,” writes Mobley, i.e., during much of last year, when the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) was underperforming the Nasdaq.

But, the SOX has outperformed since Lineary Technology (LLTC) reported on January 17th.

Since the start of 2012, only the home builder segment has performed better than the semiconductor group as measured by the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX). The SOX is up 18% year-to-date compared to a 9% rise for the NASDAQ. While the SOX lags the NASDAQ on a 3-and 5-year basis, the SOX has easily outperformed broader tech during the past year.

With respect to Marvell, which makes controller chips for hard disk drives, the “hard drive recovery trade is on,” as investors swooped into Marvell and also shares of drive makers Western Digital (WDC) and Seagate Technology (STX) upon signs of a relief following floods in Thailand that devastated the industry.

“Now that the HDD recovery trade is evident, we believe it may be time to trim positions in HDD-related semiconductor companies,” writes Mobley.

Calling Broadcom “Broadcom is the nicest house in a re-gentrified neighborhood,” Mobley nevertheless thinks that although the consensus estimate for 2012 EPS may rise beyond the $2.77 per share it’s at now, that amount should be discounted.

Investors will continue to discount FY12 and 1H13 EPS estimates to account for the eventual (April 2013) absence of Qualcomm royalties. Excluding the Qualcomm royalties, investors may assume Broadcom�s earnings power, in optimal industry conditions, to approximate $2.60 to $2.70. Based on this range, shares are trading at 15.0x EPS and are in line with other large-cap semiconductor and tech hardware companies.

Shares of Broadcom are down 40 cents, or 1%, at $36.60, shares of Marvell are down 25 cents, or 1.6%, at $15.80, and the Merrill Lynch Semiconductors HOLDRS ETF is up 5 cents at $34.22.

Top picks 2012: McCormick & Co.


Sticking with a trend can be a good thing. The trend I'm sticking with in 2012 is dividend-growth investing � buying shares in companies that continually increase their dividend year after year.

That�s why I�m going with McCormick & Co. (MKC) in 2012. The company has decades of annual dividend increases behind it.

The latest increase occurred in November, when the board hiked the quarterly payment 11% to $0.31 a share from $0.28, thus marking 26 consecutive years of increased payouts.

McCormick brands command 40-60% of the spices, herbs, and seasonings market in which it competes. �

Innovation and invention would seem at odds with so basic a product. But nearly 10% of McCormick's $3.3 billion in 2010 was derived from new value-adding products such as Grill Mates, Slow Cookers and Perfect Pinch Seasoning Blends. All were introduced in the past three years.
McCormick continues to extend its reach by targeting new growth opportunities in the Latino market. According to the U.S. Census, over the past 10 years the Hispanic population has surged 43% to 50.5 million in 2010 from 35.3 million in 2000.

Additional growth opportunities exist overseas in developing economies. McCormick has been expanding aggressively over the past year, buying a Polish spice maker and starting a joint venture with a firm in India.

Management, by extending established names and acquiring new businesses in new markets, keeps revenue, earnings, and dividend growth on a northerly trajectory.

That trajectory has taken a sharper incline of late. Revenue growth over the past 10 years has averaged 5.4%, and has picked up considerably to 8.7% over the last 12 months.� �

McCormick's earnings growth is even more intriguing. Earnings per share have grown 11% annually for the past 10 years. �

I chalk up strong EPS growth to management's innate ability to ring inefficiency out of the firm's operations: In 2001, gross and operating margins were 40.9% and 10.6%, respectively; at the end of 2010, gross and operating margins were 42.5% and 15.3%. �

I expect this trend of efficient growth to continue into the relevant future. Revenue is expected to grow 10% in 2012 to $4.05 billion, while EPS is expected to grow 13% to $3.15, which puts the forward price-to-earnings multiple at 15 � the low side of the five-year average of 18.

Given management's proven ability to grow McCormick smartly and efficiently, I think it is deserving of a higher multiple, particularly when factoring in the likely prospect of slow, or even no, growth in the major western economies.

I think more investors, increasingly starved for income and growth, will flock to companies like McCormick.


Is Your Financial Situation Grave? Try Zombie Economics

The brain-eating undead have something to teach you about money. That's the novel approach of Zombie Economics: A Guide to Personal Finance (Avery/Penguin, $18), out this month.

Zombie Economics likens debt to an invasion of moaning, shuffling ugliness that will munch your brains if you don't take serious action. The book weaves practical advice into a tale of advancing undead horror. You're essentially slaying zombies with every step you take to tackle your money woes.

"The zombie metaphor is a great translation to deliver ideas with punch, clarity and immediacy that will register with people," said Rick Emerson, a Portland, Ore., broadcaster who wrote the book with CNN Radio economic correspondent Lisa Desjardins. The horror-filled how-to serves as an antidote to chirpy quick-fix books, he told DailyFinance. "You can find your way out of financial stress, but it's not going to happen tomorrow. There's a step by step way to do this, but you have to buckle down and be honest with yourself."

Emerson admits that the information and advice the book presents isn't new. It's all in the delivery, punctuated by urgency and frankness. One cold-blooded chapter, "Shooting Dad in the Head," exhorts readers to sever ties with "financially infected" friends and family. Even Dad. The symptoms of such unfortunate victims include compulsive shopping, constantly borrowing money for non-emergencies, and bragging about their precarious financial situations. Just as you would never open the door to a zombie horde, you should avoid cosigning loans or handing out money to the financially infected. "They are a disease that walks like a person," Emerson said. "It's not a matter of being an irritation or annoyance. They will harm you -- legally and emotionally."

Zombie Economics begins its advice with a no-brainer, commanding readers to pay their bills for shelter, food, light and water. Immediately. Those who can't will be presented with grave options later, including the last-resort: "Setting Fire to the House," aka declaring bankruptcy. The book also offers tips on avoiding zombies in the first place for everyone from college students to retirees.

Those overwhelmed by choices need concrete instructions in the correct order, the author explained. The tools required to regain your financial footing are the same as those required to survive a zombie apocalypse.

Emerson got the monstrous idea for Zombie Economics over a dinner conversation with his wife about friends losing their jobs. What would be the ideal pop-culture vehicle to convey the terror of facing financial ruin? Zombies popped into his head within seconds, he recalled.

"You have to save yourself and your family," he said. "No one is going to save you. That's the overriding premise of this book."

3 Industries With a Big Upside in 2012

The following video is part of our daily MarketFoolery podcast, in which host Chris Hill and advisor Joe Magyer and senior analyst Jason Moser analyze the latest business and investing news. In this segment, the guys discuss why companies in the insurance, health-care and industrial sectors are poised for a strong 2012.

Please enable Javascript to view this video.

Why is Warren Buffett interested in the banking industry? The Motley Fool has a brand new report, "The Stocks Only the Smartest Investors Are Buying," that explains why Buffett and others are looking to the banking industry for their next investments. You can access this just-released report by clicking here -- it's free.

Starbucks Strikes Fear in Green Mountain Investors

For months, Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (GMCR) investors knew that Starbucks (SBUX) was planning its own single-serve brewer. Shares had plunged on the initial news in March that Starbucks would make its own machine. Shares fell another 9.6% today.

StarbucksVerismo, Starbucks’s new single-cup espresso and coffee machine.

And yet, maybe GMCR fans hoped it would never actually come to fruition. Because when Starbucks’ Verismo machine was unveiled today, investors acted like they were surprised, or maybe they were just wowed by its latte-brewing skills. The new brewer will start arriving in stores next week.

Green Mountain controls about 90% of the single-cup market, the Wall Street Journal notes. But the competitive landscape appears to have shifted from when Starbucks announced a deal in March of 2011 to sell its coffee for distribution in GMCR’s Keurig brewers. Around that time, GMCR owned the buzz in the industry, and analysts were chattering about GMCR taking market share from Starbucks. The Starbucks–GMCR partnership looked like a way for Starbucks to catch up, an if-you-can’t-beat-them-join-them move.

That momentum appears to have shifted, and investors may have realized that more than ever today.

In a conference call today, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz said “For the time being we’re committed to the partnership with Green Mountain.”

The operative phrase? “For the time being…”

10/28/2012

Options Now – Gold and Silver, VIX and VXX

Two big stories in the past 24 hours. Violence in Libya, �euphoria in Knicks-land.

One of stories has caused a bit of a rush into gold and silver and of course the SPDR Gold Trust (NYSE: GLD) and iShares Silver Trust (NYSE: SLV) ETF’s, which actually track moves in their commodity brethren quite well. And begat some interest in the weekly options. Most interesting in GLD we see speculation in the Weekly GLD Feb 139 Calls, though at 20 cents it�s a cheap dollar play that the Fear Train rolls on. SLV also seeing cheap dollar speculation in the modestly out-of-the-money Weekly SLV Feb 33 Calls. Unlike GLD though, there’s more volume in regular March options in SLV than there is in the Weeklys.

Not seeing all that much in CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) or the iPath S&P 500 VIX Short Term Futures (NYSE: VXX) options so far, but lots of early volume in VXX itself. 11 Million shares have traded in a little over an hour. Only five days have ever seen over 20 million shares of VXX change hands. The record of over 36 million that changed hands on January 28th appears safe, but we could easily surpass the 25.1 million that traded on January 19th and slide into the number two slot. I tend to read excess interest in owning volatility as contrarian (too much Fear) but opinions certainly differ on this.

Follow Adam Warner on Twitter @agwarner.

Clorox: Dividends, Earnings And Valuation Analysis

A Dividend Champion is defined as a company that has increased its dividend every year for 25 or more straight years. Clorox Co. (CLX) is a dividend champion that has raised its dividend every year for 34 consecutive years. The complete Dividend Champions list is compiled courtesy of David Fish. (Open as an excel spreadsheet and look at the tabs on the bottom to find the Dividend Champions list).

About Clorox Co. (from their website):

The Clorox Company is a leading manufacturer and marketer of consumer products with 8,100 employees and fiscal year 2011 revenues of $5.2 billion. Clorox markets some of consumers' most trusted and recognized brand names, including its namesake bleach and cleaning products, Green Works® naturally derived home care products, Pine-Sol® cleaners, Poett® home care products, Fresh Step® cat litter, Kingsford® charcoal, Hidden Valley® and K C Masterpiece® dressings and sauces, Brita® water-filtration products, Glad® bags, wraps and containers, and Burt's Bees® and gud™ natural personal care products. Nearly 90 percent of the company's brands hold the No. 1 or No. 2 market share positions in their categories. The company's products are manufactured in more than two dozen countries and marketed in more than 100 countries. Clorox is committed to making a positive difference in the communities where its employees work and live. Founded in 1980, The Clorox Company Foundation has awarded cash grants totaling more than $84 million to nonprofit organizations, schools and colleges. In fiscal year 2011 alone, the foundation awarded $4 million in cash grants, and Clorox made product donations valued at $13 million.

Clorox Co.: A Dividend Champion with 34 Consecutive Years of Dividend Increases

Since dividends are paid out of earnings, a clear perspective of a company's historical earnings growth record is a vital component of a dividend investor's prudent due diligence process. The following graph plots Clorox Co.'s earnings per share since 1993. A quick glance to the right of the graph shows that Clorox Co. has increased earnings at a compounded rate of 9.7% (see purple circle on graph) per annum.

Dividend Champions Gave Shareholders a Raise in Income 25 Years Straight or Longer

With interest rates hovering near all-time lows, investors seeking income are faced with very limited choices. The traditional high yield available from bonds and other fixed income vehicles are no longer available to meet the goals of retirees needing income to live off of. Moreover, it is almost a certainty that today's low yields are not adequate enough to fight inflation. Consequently, there is a growing investor interest in dividend paying common stocks, especially those that have a long record of increasing their dividends every year.

Earnings Determine Market Price and Dividend Income: The following earnings and price correlated F.A.S.T. Graphs™ clearly illustrates the importance of earnings to both price movement and dividend income. The earnings growth rate line or True Worth™ line (orange line with white triangles) is correlated with the historical stock price line. On graph after graph the lines will move in tandem. If the stock price strays away from the earnings line (over or under), inevitably it will come back to earnings.

Since dividends are paid out of earnings, and therefore represent additional return on top of what the market capitalizes earnings at, they are depicted by the light blue shaded area and stacked on top of the earnings line. Therefore, a quick visual of these two important components is simultaneously revealed: The additional return that dividend paying stocks provide, plus the percentage of earnings paid to shareholders as dividends (payout ratio).

Performance Table: Capital Appreciation and Dividend Income Clorox Co.

The associated performance results with the earnings and price correlated graph, validates the above discussion regarding the two components of total return: Capital appreciation and dividend income. Dividends are included in the total return calculation and are assumed paid, but not reinvested.

When presented separately like this, the additional rate of return a dividend paying stock produces for shareholders becomes undeniably evident. In addition to the 9.6% capital appreciation (Closing Annualized ROR), long-term shareholders of Clorox Co. would have received an additional $166,427.20 in dividends that increased their total return from 9.6% to 11.1% per annum.

(Note: Since this is a Dividend Champion it has raised its dividend every year for at least 25 years; therefore, negative dividend growth rates shown, if any, will be attributed to special additional dividends paid in excess of the company's regularly reported dividend rate)

The following graph plots the historically normal PE ratio (the dark blue line) correlated with 10-year Treasury note interest. Notice that the current price earnings ratio on this quality company is as low as it has been since 1993.

A further indication of valuation can be seen by examining a company's current price to sales ratio relative to its historical price to sales ratio. The current price to sales ratio for Clorox Co. is 1.65, which is historically low.

Looking to the Future

Extensive research has provided a preponderance of conclusive evidence that future long-term returns, and the dividend and its growth rate are a function of two critical determinants:

1. The rate of change (growth rate) of the company's earnings

2. The price or valuation you pay to buy those earnings

Therefore, forecasting future earnings growth, bought at sound valuations, is the key to safe, sound, and profitable performance.

Therefore, it logically follows that measuring performance without simultaneously measuring valuation is a job half done. At its current price, which is attractively aligned with its True Worth™ valuation, Clorox Co. represents a potential opportunity to invest in a Dividend Champion at a reasonable price. The important factor is that Clorox Co. has real assets and cash flow underpinning its stock price. This solid economic foundation offers shareholders the potential for both a strong margin of safety and an opportunity for an increasing dividend income stream and potentially attractive future returns.

The Estimated Earnings and Return Calculator Tool is a simple yet powerful resource that empowers the user to calculate and run various investing scenarios that generate precise rate of return potentialities. Thinking the investment through to its logical conclusion is an important component towards making sound and prudent commonsense investing decisions.

The consensus of 17 leading analysts reporting to Capital IQ forecast Clorox Co. long-term earnings growth at 9%. Clorox Co. has high long-term debt at 104% of capital. Clorox Co. is currently trading at a P/E of 16.4, which is inside the value corridor (defined by the five orange lines) of a maximum P/E of 18. If the earnings materialize as forecast, Clorox Co.'s True Worth valuation would be $93.59 at the end of 2017, which would be a 9.9% annual rate of return from the current price, including assumed dividends.

Earnings Yield Estimates

Discounted Future Cash Flows: All companies derive their value from the future cash flows (earnings) they are capable of generating for their stakeholders over time. Therefore, because Earnings Determine Market Price and dividend income in the long run, we expect the future earnings of a company to justify the price we pay.

Since all investments potentially compete with all other investments, it is useful to compare investing in any prospective company to that of a comparable investment in low risk Treasury bonds. Comparing an investment in Clorox Co. to an equal investment in 10-year Treasury bonds illustrates that Clorox Co.'s expected earnings would be 4.6 times that of the 10-Year T-Bond Interest. (See EYE chart below). This is the essence of the importance of proper valuation as a critical investing component.

Summary & Conclusions

This report presents essential "fundamentals at a glance" on Dividend Champion Clorox Co., illustrating the past and present valuation based on earnings achievements as reported. Future forecasts for earnings growth are based on the consensus of leading analysts. Although with just a quick glance you can know a lot about the company, it's imperative that the reader conduct his or her own due diligence in order to validate whether the consensus estimates seem reasonable or not.

Disclosure: I am long CLX.

Disclaimer: The opinions in this document are for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell the stocks mentioned or to solicit transactions or clients. Past performance of the companies discussed may not continue and the companies may not achieve the earnings growth as predicted. The information in this document is believed to be accurate, but under no circumstances should a person act upon the information contained within. We do not recommend that anyone act upon any investment information without first consulting an investment advisor as to the suitability of such investments for his specific situation.

Friday FX Interest Rate Monitor

Global bonds are up in a curious week dramatized by acceleration in monetary tightening in China. Its move was a pre-emptive measure to curb the excesses of its own rescue plans from morphing into the next asset bubble. The effects of that move turned out to be short-lived in terms of only temporarily reducing risk appetite but still investors are now left clutching at straws looking for any signs of growth. Japanese bond yields slipped to the lowest in a week after data showed weakness in U.S. retail sales last month. If growth peters out to a plateau, expect a further bond market rally.

The yield rally was further accelerated on Friday as tensions appear to mount between the ECB and the government of Greece. This story remains a rehash of what we already know. For its part the government of Greece has admitted its shortcomings and today submitted its deficit reduction strategy using spending cuts and tax increases to help cut a deficit of more than 12% of GDP. The aim is to reduce this percentage back to within the 3% EU guideline as soon as possible. For its part the ECB continues to try and get its message to Greece. Whether this is for the benefit of reporters when ECB president Trichet speaks, I’m unclear. Mr. Trichet today underlined that the ECB will not tailor its collateral rules at the end of this year to satisfy the needs of any single nation. If debt issued by Greece doesn’t carry a sufficient credit rating at the end of 2010, it will be shunned by investors unable to use it as acceptable collateral into 2011. Typically yields rise to compensate investors, but the grade of the bond is the ultimate arbiter here.

Since Wednesday the yield on the two-year Greek government note has accelerated from 2.90% to 3.70% - an 80 basis point swing. Meanwhile ultra-safe German debt at the same maturity has benefitted from the rise in bond prices this week with its yield falling eight basis points to 1.12%. The spread between the two has widened by 88 basis points in two days to stand at 258 basis points

Eurodollar futures – The sanguine tone passed over to American markets this morning with neither consumer price nor industrial production data changing the picture from one of tepid economic growth. Treasury notes are at the highest price in a week and testing the upside after a heavy week of issuance during which a 30-year auction attracted the heaviest demand in four months. The March t-note is higher by over half a point this morning at 117-09 where the yield has dropped six basis points overnight to 3.68%. Earlier in the week the yield spread between two and 10-year maturities had widened out to 290 basis points. Today the spread has narrowed to 280 basis points as the curve is massaged lower and flatter by investors’ trades. The December Eurodollar contract is higher by four ticks with the yield just nine basis points north of 1% - its lowest since December 1.

European short futures – German bund prices are at a three-week high sending the yield at the 10-year down to 3.27%. Euribor futures are also two to three ticks lower.

British interest rate futures – 10-year British government debt shed a further two basis points today to 3.95%, sending March gilt futures higher by 36 ticks to 115.14. The British data calendar was clear and in a sense the focus on Greece and its possible impact on peripheral member debt is a relief for Britain. Such focus allows the pound and the government’s own fiscal folly some breathing space

Australian rate futures –Yesterday’s strong retail sales data possibly cemented the path to a further rate increase from the RBA early in February. However, the reaction yesterday seen as bill futures were sold looked overdone to traders this morning in light of the comedown for global yields. Hence bills are up six or seven ticks to close the week. The yield on the 10-year government note slipped just one basis point into the close at 5.57%.

Canada’s 90-day BAs – A strong Canadian dollar does little for short term money traders. The local dollar reached its highest in at least three months in Thursday’s trade and if anything that tightens overall monetary conditions. The Bank of Canada announced several quarters ago that it wouldn’t change its policy stance through the middle of 2010 and right now that looks like a statement that can’t be challenged. Today 90-day bill prices are up a couple of ticks while Canadian government bond futures are higher by 49 ticks to 119.19 sending the yield down by four basis points to 3.51%.

Japan – JGB prices matched the highest in a week allowing yields to slip to 1.32% on signs of a plateau for global growth. The March JGB future rose to 139.11.

Is JAKKS Pacific the Perfect Stock?

Every investor would love to stumble upon the perfect stock. But will you ever really find a stock that provides everything you could possibly want?

One thing's for sure: You'll never discover truly great investments unless you actively look for them. Let's discuss the ideal qualities of a perfect stock, then decide if JAKKS Pacific (Nasdaq: JAKK  ) fits the bill.

The quest for perfection
Stocks that look great based on one factor may prove horrible elsewhere, making due diligence a crucial part of your investing research. The best stocks excel in many different areas, including these important factors:

  • Growth. Expanding businesses show healthy revenue growth. While past growth is no guarantee that revenue will keep rising, it's certainly a better sign than a stagnant top line.
  • Margins. Higher sales mean nothing if a company can't produce profits from them. Strong margins ensure that company can turn revenue into profit.
  • Balance sheet. At debt-laden companies, banks and bondholders compete with shareholders for management's attention. Companies with strong balance sheets don't have to worry about the distraction of debt.
  • Money-making opportunities. Return on equity helps measure how well a company is finding opportunities to turn its resources into profitable business endeavors.
  • Valuation. You can't afford to pay too much for even the best companies. By using normalized figures, you can see how a stock's simple earnings multiple fits into a longer-term context.
  • Dividends. For tangible proof of profits, a check to shareholders every three months can't be beat. Companies with solid dividends and strong commitments to increasing payouts treat shareholders well.

With those factors in mind, let's take a closer look at JAKKS Pacific.

Factor

What We Want to See

Actual

Pass or Fail?

Growth 5-Year Annual Revenue Growth > 15% 1.2% Fail
1-Year Revenue Growth > 12% (1.8%) Fail
Margins Gross Margin > 35% 32.7% Fail
Net Margin > 15% 5.1% Fail
Balance Sheet Debt to Equity < 50% 22.0% Pass
Current Ratio > 1.3 3.07 Pass
Opportunities Return on Equity > 15% 9.1% Fail
Valuation Normalized P/E < 20 15.66 Pass
Dividends Current Yield > 2% 2.9% Pass
5-Year Dividend Growth > 10% NM NM
Total Score 4 out of 9

Source: S&P Capital IQ. NM = not meaningful; JAKKS started paying a dividend in Sept. 2011. Total score = number of passes.

With four points, JAKKS Pacific doesn't seem like it's winning the investing game just yet. The toymaker has some things going for it, but in a highly competitive industry, it needs to keep working harder to thrive.

JAKKS is the company behind a wide variety of licensed toys, games, and costumes, with rights to popular franchises including Pokemon, Disney Princess, Iron Man, and Sesame Street, just to name a few. With relationships with many companies, including Disney (NYSE: DIS  ) , Time Warner's (NYSE: TWX  ) Warner Bros., and Hasbro (Nasdaq: HAS  ) , JAKKS manages to walk the line toward making all of its licensing partners happy rather than having to go to exclusive partnerships that would limit its offerings.

But for the most part, the entire toy industry has struggled lately. In their most recent quarters, Hasbro, Mattel (Nasdaq: MAT  ) , and JAKKS all struggled, with Mattel merely meeting earnings estimates and Hasbro falling short on both sales and profits. The answer could be that kids want higher-tech toys, as LeapFrog (NYSE: LF  ) has had its stock double since August on the coattails of its LeapPad learning tablet.

Earlier this week, JAKKS management delivered a coup de grace, saying that "the sales performance of its products has been disappointing" and knocking 2011 earnings guidance down by nearly $1 per share. The stock plunged in response.

For JAKKS to start moving in the right direction, it needs to find a successful strategy for sustaining and boosting profitability. As long as huge earnings disappointments keep coming, JAKKS isn't going to get very close to perfection.

Keep searching
No stock is a sure thing, but some stocks are a lot closer to perfect than others. By looking for the perfect stock, you'll go a long way toward improving your investing prowess and learning how to separate out the best investments from the rest.

Click here to add JAKKS Pacific to My Watchlist, which can find all of our Foolish analysis on it and all your other stocks.

Finding the perfect stock is only one piece of a successful investment strategy. Get the big picture by taking a look at our "13 Steps to Investing Foolishly."